Permafrost Carbon Network

thermokarst lakescottongrasstussocksthermokarstyedoma

Synthesis Activities in Progress

The permafrost microbiome

Lead: Jessica Ernakovich (email), Rebecca Hewitt, Andreas Richter, Mark Waldrop

The Permafrost Microbiome Working Group

Objective. The permafrost microbiome synthesis group was formed to inform our understanding of how microbial communities in permafrost change following permafrost, as well as the functional implications to changes in microbial assembly. We expect this to help constrain our understanding of the role of the microbiome in greenhouse gas production from thawed permafrost.

Plan. We are building a database of bacterial, archaeal, and fungal sequences from permafrost soils. In the near term, we expect to produce (1) an overview paper of the state-of-the-knowledge about the permafrost microbiome in a changing Arctic (as we assemble the database), (2) a Pan-Arctic study on the abiotic (and possibly biotic) biogeography of methanogens and methanotrophs, and (3) a Pan-Arctic study on changes to the taxonomy (and perhaps also functional potential) of the permafrost microbiome with thaw. 

Want to be involved? Please contact Jessica Ernakovich if you have a dataset and/or additional knowledge or interest in the project that you would like to contribute.




Quantifying relationships between vegetation structure and permafrost thermal dynamics

Lead: Mike Loranty (email), Sue Natali, Alexander Kholodov

Overview: The purpose of this synthesis is to elucidate empirical and mechanistic relationships that exist between ecosystem structure and permafrost thermal dynamics at the pan-Arctic scale. We will accomplish this by combining data from the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) and Thermal State of Permafrost (TSP) networks with satellite and field observations describing vegetation structure and function. The ultimate objectives are twofold: 1) to improve process level understanding of how ecosystem influences on surface energy partitioning affect permafrost thermal dynamics, and 2) to quantify functional relationships between key variables that can be used to benchmark land surface models.


Resistivity measurements in permafrost soils (credit: M. Loranty)

Where and when will the arctic become wetter or drier?

Lead: Christian Andresen (email), Cathy Wilson

Overview: Lowland landscapes comprise ~30% of the Arctic and sub-Arctic and are characterized by large expanses of saturated soils, wetlands, ice-wedge polygon ponds and thermokarst ponds and lakes. The Alaska coastal plain and river valleys and deltas are examples of regions where low soil-water storage capacity due to the presence of shallow permafrost coupled with low evapotranspiration rates and poor drainage potential leads to flooded conditions across a large portion of the landscape throughout the thaw season. These low-gradient regions are often carbon and ice rich depositional environments that are likely to contribute relatively high CH4 emissions to the climate system as permafrost thaws. In continuous permafrost regions hilly landscapes have low soil-water storage capacity, low evapotranspiration and low precipitation, but are better drained than lowland areas due to topographically-driven shallow subsurface lateral flow. Even relatively small climate driven changes in thermal-hydrology may drive large shifts in ecosystem function.

Earth System Models predict an overall drying of Arctic soils by the end of the 21st century due to increased evapotranspiration and active layer depth, but they are not able to represent the spatial and temporal heterogeneity in both increasing and decreasing lake, pond, wetland and wet tundra area observed in the Arctic over recent decades. This paper aims to review the existing data and predictions that provide insight into how eco-hydro-thermal-mechanical processes and subsurface properties control water storage capacity and vertical and horizontal hydrologic fluxes in the Arctic. The paper will synthesize this information into a framework that will inform what new data and modeling strategies are needed to enable better prediction of where and when Arctic landscapes will get wetter or drier.

Dissolved organic matter composition in wates draining permafrost landscapes

Lead: Jon O'Donnell (email), George Aiken, Jorien Vonk, David Olefeldt, Robert Spencer, Sue Natali

Overview: In high latitude watersheds, dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition is sensitive to permafrost thaw and subsequent shifts in watershed hydrology. Chemical composition is also an important control on DOM mineralization rates in soils and aquatic ecosystems, and may influence the magnitude of carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Many of the techniques used to characterize to DOM are relatively simple to measure, yet can be difficult to interpret.  Thus, a primary goal is to examine patterns in DOM along a soil-to-ocean continuum in the northern permafrost region, and to use these data to improve our understanding of C cycling.  In particular, we seek to understand the composition and fate of organic matter derived from both contemporary and ancient (i.e. permafrost) sources

Synthesis objectives are to 1) examine patterns of composition along soil-to-ocean continuum and 2) to improve our understanding of DOM fate from contemporary and ancient carbon sources

Arctic river landscape (credit: J. O'Donnell)


Permafrost Region methane budgets: 3 activities

1) synthesis of on shore CH4 emissions in the northern permafrost region (2015 – 2017), and prospective analysis (2018 – 2019)

Lead: A. David McGuire (), Robie McDonalds, Jennifer Frederick

Overview: This activity largely builds on the synthesis activities conducted by David Olefeldt on wetland emissions (Olefeldt et al. 2013) and on lake emission (Wik et al. 2016).  A key to producing these synthesized estimates will be to properly stratify the available data into wetland types and lake types that can be identified in spatial data bases across the permafrost region.  The key challenge to scaling is to use reliable spatial data bases. Some efforts in developing spatial data bases for wetlands and lakes that do not overlap have been started for Alaska, and it is not clear whether the Alaska methodology will work across the entire permafrost region. Also, there is the issue of how much net methane consumption occurs across terrestrial ecosystems in the permafrost region. Finally, an important challenge is to quantify and partition methane emissions in the permafrost region among terrestrial gas hydrates, natural fossil fuel sources, and from oil and gas exploration and transport. This will require developing realistic estimates of terrestrial gas hydrate inventory obtained from observations and indirect evidence, and gas hydrate thermodynamic stability fields across the terrestrial permafrost region. Because gas hydrate in the Arctic is closely linked with petroleum systems, the challenge will lie in teasing apart the relative amount of methane emissions from dissociating gas hydrate deposits, natural fossil sources of methane, and leaking petroleum systems. This group will need to identify how to overcome these challenges.  
The synthesis by this group will also try to ascertain what the data indicate about how much methane could be emitted from wetlands and lakes through 2300. 
Timeline: 2015-2017: Retrospective Analysis; 2018-2019 Prospective Analysis.


2) Synthesis of C4 emissions from coastal waters of the Arctic Ocean and its marginal seas (2015 – 2017) and prospective analysis (2018-2019)

Lead: Jennifer Frederick (), Dave McGuire, Robie McDonalds

Overview: This activity requires the assembly of the publicly available data on methane concentrations in coastal waters of the Arctic Ocean and its marginal seas and the use of those data in a range of methodologies for estimating methane emissions and uncertainties.  This group needs to identify the data available, the appropriate strata for estimating methane emissions from coastal waters, the appropriate methods that can be used for estimating methane emissions for particular strata, and the scaling methodology across strata.
An attempt will be made to separate emissions into their sources, based on available data, observations, and a reasonable knowledge of occuring processes. A key initial step to conducting this synthesis will require realistic estimates of gas hydrate inventory obtained from observations and indirect evidence, and gas hydrate thermodynamic stability fields across the entire cirum-Arctic shelf.  Because gas hydrate in the Arctic is closely linked with submarine permafrost and fossil sources, the challenge will lie in teasing apart the relative amount of methane emissions from degrading submarine permafrost, fossil sources, and dissociating gas hydrate deposits. Biogenic methanogenesis in degrading submarine permafrost may be able to be estimated based on terrestrial permafrost carbon budgets (since submarine permafrost was once terrestrial). The contribution from gas hydrate deposits will be approached with a heat-budget analysis on the hydrate inventory estimates.
Finally, an attempt will be made to understand methane emissions resulting from the delivery of carbon from the terrestrial ecosystem to coastal environments through rivers and coastal erosion.
The synthesis by this group will also try to ascertain what the data indicate about how much methane could be emitted from coastal ecosystems through 2300. 
Timeline: 2015-2017: Retrospective Analysis; 2018-2019: Prospective Analysis. 


3) Synthesis of CH4 emissions from the on shore and off shore permafrost region based on atmospheric data (2015 –2017) and prospective analysis (2018-  2019)

Lead: Merritt Turetsky (), Lori Bruhwiler, and Chip Miller

Overview: This activity will first conduct a synthesis of top-down estimates of methane emissions (derived from both flask networks, aircraft campaigns, and other observations) for the permafrost region (both on shore and off shore) to identify uncertainties in space and time (in recent decades).  It will then conduct a synthesis that brings together the bottom-up estimates from products/activities 1 and 2 with the top-down synthesis to estimate contemporary methane emissions and their uncertainties across the permafrost region.  These syntheses will be useful for the further development and evaluation of process-based models of methane emissions.
Timeline: 2015-2017: Synthesis of top-down estimates; 2018-2019: Synthesis to reconcile uncertainties in top-down and bottom-up- retrospective estimates .

Methane bubbles (credit National Geographic)


back to top